BOB HARTRANFT | Good Thinking
|BACK TO HARTRANFT.ORG About Robert M. Hartranft Building Pyramids Lady Liberty's Crown Cosmology Theological Physics Inertia and Gravity Compendium of Articles|
|Particle Properties Low Hertz Vibration Therapy Grades, Admissions and Scholarships Graphical Summary Physics Memories Personal Philosophy News and Articles Contact Us|
Inertia and Gravity
30 October 2016 Version
Robert M. Hartranft Scott W. Hartranft
Simsbury CT 06070 Aloha OR 97006
Inertial mass and gravitational mass seem like unrelated properties, but are identical even in extremely precise experiments. We suggest here that inertia is simply self-gravity. We further suggest that the graviton has mass zero.
Suppose a very large physicist decided that the planet Earth should be treated as a particle – the “earthon”. The earthon has very high inertia because it has self-gravity. At the other extreme, a very small physicist, working at Plank scale – 10-35 meters – would have the same conclusion about particles like electrons and quarks, whose immense relative size would cause them to interact with their own gravitons.
In short, inertia is the result of self-gravity. Inertial mass is equal to gravitational mass because they derive from the same process – gravity: self-gravity in one case; external gravity in the other.
Consider now the photon and the postulated graviton. The photon is the carrier of the electromagnetic force, but it has zero electric charge, and does not itself experience the electromagnetic force. For example, a light beam can pass through an intense magnetic field with no effect on either the light or the field.
By analogy, the graviton should have zero net mass, even including relativistic effects, and should not itself experience gravity.
In current models, a zero mass-energy particle has no properties of any kind, and simply does not exist. In our model, however, it can be a composite particle, with equal amounts of positive and negative mass material. If each part has spin 1, then the graviton is a mass 0, spin 2 particle.
This would provide an intuitively natural basis for gravitation: “source” mass (the sun, for example) would emit an endless series of gravitons in random directions. The emissions would probably occur in pairs to avoid a spin change in the emitting matter. Since the gravitons have zero mass, this continues with no change to the sun, exactly as observed.
We will leave for later a model of the interaction with the “distant” mass (the Earth, for example), except to say that the gravitons must continue in a straight line forever.
In combination, these models show why mass increases as v approaches c
Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx more later
Rearward gravitons Forward gravitons